Why improve the interchange?
The I-55 interchange was designed and constructed in the mid 1960s,
therefore the design does not meet current federal or state standards.
The current design has full cloverleaves with loop ramps in all four
quadrants. This design places four merge/diverge points in proximity to each other. As a result, drivers weave and merge to get to
their desired interchanges and/or lanes, which causes a decrease of
traffic speed/flow, creates unsafe driving conditions, and severely
congests the area. Although the ramp speed limits are 25 miles per hour,
the average driver speed typically ranges from 5 to 10 miles per hour. A
study of traffic patterns for the area indicates that the current design
cannot handle present traffic volumes nor traffic volumes as they
increase over time. The study also determined that the Level of Service
(LOS: See FAQs for explanation) will continue to decline as the number
of drivers along the I-55 Crump Boulevard interchange continues to
increase.
How does this affect the surrounding area?
The French Fort neighborhood is located adjacent to the southwest corner
of the existing interchange area. Due to the neighborhood’s location,
French Fort will be directly impacted by the various alternatives of the
proposed project. Although the neighborhood will not be divided or
truncated, the project would require the potential displacement and
relocation of eight residences and one or two businesses. All of these
potential displacements would occur at the northeastern edge of the
French Fort subdivision. Currently, there are ongoing discussions with
the City of Memphis to make a parcel of vacant land near the French Fort
neighborhood available to those displaced by the proposed project where
new housing may be constructed.
What will the proposed build alternatives look like?
Alternative A consists of proposed modifications to the
I-55 interchange that would improve traffic movements along and between
the I-55 and McLemore interchange and the Mississippi River Bridge. The
proposed improvements would provide I-55 traffic with continuous
free-flow mainline movements by eliminating the need to utilize one-lane
exit/entrance ramps to remain on the interstate. The existing loop ra mp
in the southwest quadrant would be removed, thus improving safety by
eliminating the associated weave movement in this area. Existing
infrastructure would be utilized where feasible. This alternative would
require the construction of three new structures, construction of
substantial retaining walls, relocation of seven residences and two
businesses, and elimination of the existing ramps to the Metal Museum.
The design speed for Alternative A is 50 miles per hour.
Alternative B maintains the same basic design as Alternative A
with seven residences and two businesses displaced, but incorporates
modifications to address concerns over continuity for southbound I 55
motorists wishing to access EH Crump Boulevard immediately after
crossing the Missi ssippi River. Southbound I-55 motorists would be
provided continuous access to EH Crump Boulevard via an
outside auxiliary road that would cross under the four-lane mainline
structure. The two signalized intersections on Illinois Avenue proposed
in Alternative A would be eliminated. Unlike Alternative A, this option
does not include direct access to the residential and commercial
properties on Illinois Avenue from I-55. However, it does provide the southwest quadrant with direct access to eastbound EH Crump Boulevard
via an added lane that connects to the outside auxiliary lane from
southbound I-55.
What does the term “Level of Service” mean?
Level of Service, or LOS, is used to describe the functionality of a
highway. This is determined by travel time, freedom to maneuver (i.e.
change lanes), convenience of use, and comfort to the driver. There are
six pre-established LOS categories: |
| LOS A – Traffic flows at posted speed limit, and motorists
have complete mobility. In urban areas, this usually only occurs
late at night. |
 |
| LOS B – Congestion is slightly increased and mobility
becomes slightly restricted. Speeds remain near the posted
limits. |
 |
| LOS C – Traffic flow is more noticeably more restricted,
and lane changes require more vigilance. |
 |
| LOS D – Speeds become reduced, and there is an increase in the number
of vehicles. Mobility is noticeably limited. |
 |
| LOS E – Traffic flow is irregular and speeds vary. There
are no gaps in traffic, and there is little room for mobility. |
 |
| LOS F – The number of vehicles exceeds the amount
intended for the highway. There is little or no room to maneuver
and speeds are often reduced to nearly zero. |
 |